A quick note on the idea of strategic voting, especially in regards to city dwellers…
If you think that buying pushing a Liberal candidate over one for the NDP or the Greens is going to keep the Conservatives from winning the election, you’re plain wrong. Look at the voting history in your city, if the Conservatives haven’t won a seat there since your parents were as young and dumb and you, then you’re not helping anything. All you are doing is robbing an earnest NDP or Green candidate that will care about the city from sitting in the house.
And don’t be afraid to vote Green. If the Conservative are to win this election (and they will) then we’re going to need all the ecos we can get in the House.
If you still want to feel like Julius Caesar, then look at the race between the NDP and the Liberals. It might be time for a new “2nd Party” and I think, despite people’s reservations about Jack Layton, that the NDP is an ideal party to be the Official Opposition.
I started writing this on the Spacing website (www.spacing.ca/wire) but it got a little long and I don’t want to clog up their space. Also, I haven’t posted here in a long time so why not come back with a wildly unpopular opinion bundled with some inflammatory comments. Here goes…
I’m a regular business traveler and also (I’d like to think) a city booster who believes strongly in people over vehicles. It is that belief in accessible transit for all that prevents me from getting on the bandwagon against the Island Airport and, by extension, Porter Airlines. Regardless of the lousy way in which the TPA continues to fleece us through the federal government, they allow a wonderful company like Porter to exist and in the long term, that’s positive. I get fairly exasperated listening to people like our Mayor tell us out of one side of their mouth that we should support mass transit while the other side is telling us that some mass transit is better than others. What makes air travel so undesirable?
What could possibly be more accessible than a central airport? And what could be more responsible than a company that uses one of the quietest passenger airplanes in the world (the Q400) to service it? Add that the airplane was designed and built in Canada and people should be down at the airport on the weekends writing love notes on the terminal wall. Alas, this is not the case. The fight over the airport has at times become so vitriolic that that the TPA has had to sue for defamation. A case they won, by the way. (Tip: If you want to prove that an organization is the enemy, don’t lose a defamation case to them.)
So what’s the real problem here? It can’t be that an airport exists in downtown Toronto that allows people in larger Canadian cities and New York City access to our city easier and cheaper than if they had to go to Pearson. Can it?